I’ll be running a half-day workshop on Monday, April 6 on Building the Credible Sustainable Brand (4th one on this list). It builds on the webinar I conducted a few months ago on the same topic, and we’ll be doing hands-on exercises to

• identify the right brand strategy and roadmap for your business
• map & enhance your customer experience to bake in sustainability (because what your customers don’t experience, they won’t believe) and
• identify the implications for internal culture and marketing

I’m still in the process of designing this workshop so if there’s anything specific you’d like to see included under the topic of building credibility, please post a comment here. Thanks and I look forward to seeing you in Monterey!

1. Be proactive

2. Be transparent

3. Know your limits

4. Be relevant

5. Borrow credibility

6. Leverage brand strengths

7. Create a brand strategy

8. Be consistent

9. Educate

10. Engage

This list gives some good fodder for future blog posts, so stay tuned.

But it doesn’t have to be either-or. Companies that consider social and environmental initiatives as potential innovation platforms and brand builders — not expenses — will come out ahead.

The Opportunity Audit helps prioritize and inspire

To aid businesses in evaluating initiatives, (re)allocating resources and exploring white-space opportunities, we’ve developed the Fruitful Opportunity Audit. This tool maps what a company does, not what it says. That means you won’t see cause marketing programs on this audit, mainly because the Brand/Customer quadrant could hypothetically be filled with greenwash. (click to enlarge)

The columns represent the locus of initiative; whether it primarily resides with your suppliers, employees or internal operations, community or customers.

The bottom row shows tablestakes initiatives that most businesses are undertaking regardless of industry. These include basic blocking and tackling like sustainability initiatives in energy, water, waste, IT, supply chain, employee volunteerism, fair labor practices, and so on. Note that it also includes philanthropy efforts that are not directly aligned with the category or brand.

The middle row represents activities that are industry-specific. Now we’re getting into actions that are more strategically in line with your business and therefore could be more effective in reputation-building. Electronics recycling (Community/Customer), industry-related training and job creation (Employee/Community) or Fair Trade efforts among coffee and tea manufacturers (Suppliers) are a few examples.

The top row is where it gets really interesting… this is where you’ll see social-impact initiatives that directly support the brand promise. The most effective initiatives often span most, if not all columns in this row; think Plan A from Marks & Spencer, GE’s Ecomagination, Timberland, Clorox GreenWorks, and specialized ethical brands like Whole Foods and Seventh Generation. Other examples might include Best Buy’s Geek Squad Summer Academy (Community) or Fairmont Hotel’s Green Cuisine (Supplier/Community/Consumer) that aligns with their authentically local brand pillar.

Now is the time to kill sacred cows

If you plot your CSR initiatives on this chart using bubble size to approximate relative spending, you’ll see where most of your dollars are going. Is your chart weighted more heavily at the bottom or the top? If the former, how much could be  shifted to brand-building without compromising on the essentials? If the latter, good job; just make sure you’re covering your bases at the bottom to eliminate risk of goodwashing claims.

This process will inevitably generate some controversial discussion around cutting philanthropic programs that aren’t aligned with your brand.  NCR, a former client of mine that I helped reposition their brand around self-service technology, supports a wide variety of charities completely unrelated to their business through the NCR Foundation; buried on the last page of their Citizenship Report is a brief mention of how they are improving access to technology for disabled and areas with low literacy. That’s a fantastic example of triple-bottom line innovation driving the brand, but it’s being communicated like an afterthought. Imagine what a powerful ethical brand NCR could build if it reallocated its CSR investments in favor of value creation at the intersection of self-serve technology and social needs.

Please note that this is not intended to decrease the amount of funding that any particular non-profit should receive from corporations. Rather, if all corporations were thoughtful about which non-profits to support, then everybody wins. The non-profit could benefit from their corporate partner’s lobbying power and investment in ethical brand-building; the corporation benefits from the strategic alignment with the right non-profits. 1+1=3. The recession is a good opportunity to justify such shifts.

Finding competitive opportunities – a retail example

When you plot your top competitors on the same chart, you’ll start seeing patterns that give insights into opportunity areas for the brand. You might also want to plot related but non-competitive companies on the same chart to bring new ideas to the table. Below is an illustrative example from the retail space; you’ll see that Marks & Spencer in the UK has done a great job creating ethical brand drivers across all columns. Retailers in the US can borrow ideas like branding internal initiatives similar to Plan A. Likewise, M&S could borrow an idea or two from Best Buys’ branded Employee/Community initiatives. (BTW, don’t get hung up on circle size; I don’t have enough info to map to investment levels. Just take it for the illustrative example that it is.)

You can push the innovation potential even further by mapping completely unrelated companies or industries for inspiration. For example, what could micro-finance teach the retail industry? If I’m Target, perhaps I combine “enabling individual potential”  of Kiva.org with my “design/value” brand promise to create a program that gives design students (or employees!) an opportunity to be discovered, promoted and funded for their product design ideas. That’s a program that spans all four columns of Brand-Builders.

I’m interested in your feedback. Is this a useful framework? What are the roadblocks to adopting this approach in your company? Who would actually drive this… CRO or CMO? CEO? And of course, if you see anything big that I missed in the retail audit, let me know.

Brand: Who you are, not what you say

First, let’s back up and define what a brand is. More than a logo, tagline or campaign, a brand is a promise delivered. It’s no longer about marketing; it’s about co-creating your reputation with your customers and managing perceptions through your actions. That means your brand could be favorable or unfavorable, depending on how you interact within your ecosystem and whether you’ve actively managed your brand or not.

A brand strategy is, in essence, a focused strategic platform that guides every aspect of the business. It should incorporate 4Ds: desirable by customers, deliverable by the company, distinctive from the competition, and durable over time. It’s a blueprint for how you do business, as well as for the entire customer experience.

Since brand is inherently about building a reputation, it’s not a stretch to say that strategic CSR is all about brand-building… not philanthropy or community programs. The latter are among the tactics to be judiciously identified and tailored to support a desired outcome, which should be to build a clear, consistent and believable reputation among your constituents that engenders preference and loyalty. That desired outcome informs the entire customer experience as well as how you do business.

Five strategies for aligning brand with values

There are five brand strategy approaches that are directly relevant to building your ethical reputation.

Align with Brand Differentiator

Ideally your ethical initiatives will directly support your brand promise. Remember, a brand is a promise delivered… so consider what makes your brand unique from competitors and develop key initiatives to support that. For example, one of Target’s philanthropy programs is to support the arts and design, which directly supports Target’s “affordable design” brand differentiator. Instead of cutting your CSR programs during the downturn, consider shifting resources from generic programs to those that support and drive not just your category, but your brand.

Create an Ingredient Brand

Think Westin’s Heavenly Bed or, in the CSR space, Marks & Spencer’s Plan A or GE’s Ecomagination. This is the ‘special sauce’ that makes your brand preferable to values-based buyers and employees. Creating a brand for your ethical initiatives accomplishes several important objectives:

• Helps clarify for employees and customers your ethical value proposition
• Makes it easier to allocate human and financial resources to your initiative (hint: assign a brand manager to own, drive and measure)
• Serves as a growth platform for customer experiences, products and services
• Elevates your social and environmental initiatives above me-too commodity status.

There are a few risks of goodwashing with this approach, so be sure that everyone is committed to creating something of unique value that’s completely aligned with the vision and values of the parent brand. And any misstep by the parent brand may end up discrediting the hard work done to build the ethical ingredient brand.

Create a Product Brand

If there are values-driven buyers in your category (highly likely), consider launching a product just for them. Clorox GreenWorks and BP Solar are good examples. Note that these brands are tied closely to their parent brands, so don’t consider this option unless the parent company is doing its part on the ethics front. But a product brand is an excellent opportunity to help customers experience your values and simultaneously boost the profit part of the triple bottom line. Case in point, GreenWorks has now captured 42% of the natural cleaner category in a little over a year.

Create a New Sub-Brand

A separate brand (with its own customer experience, distribution channels, etc.) that’s completely anchored on the triple-bottom line puts a bit of distance between it and the parent company. Good examples include Starwood’s Element or, through acquisition, Unilever’s Ben & Jerry’s. Why use a sub-brand strategy?

• To lead your category in capturing hearts and minds of values-oriented consumers without being saddled with baggage of the parent company
• To minimize claims of greenwashing, as all actions of the sub-brand are (should be) congruent.
• To help “turn the Titanic” and reposition the parent company as an ethical brand. The parent company can “borrow” the positive brand equity from the sub-brand while going through the process of cleaning up its act.

Acquisition is the easier route, but often the ethical brand gets flack for “selling out” if it’s not handled carefully, and core values still need to be aligned. Building it yourself is harder, but the benefits could easily outweigh the effort required.

Reposition the Brand

This option is especially important for companies with a history of contributing to the problems of the planet rather than the solutions. Formerly “evil” companies like Wal-Mart, McDonald’s and BP have made great strides in redefining their brands as more responsible. With a very large company, this is a process that takes years and top-down dedicated effort to fundamentally change the essence and ethos of the company. For a smaller brand it’s definitely easier.

No hard and fast rules

Please note that there are no easy answers or guidelines here. The most appropriate approach for your company depends on the unique combination of your customers, their expectations and perceptions of your brand versus other options, the progress you’ve made in the ethical realm, whether or not you actually have a clearly defined brand promise, the commitment level from your executive team… I could go on, but you get the point.

I’m happy to have a preliminary discussion with you about the right approach and key considerations for your business; just contact me at jennifer@fruitfulstrategy.com.

When building a reputation as an ethical company, actions speak louder than words. Yet in most businesses, these actions are happening behind the scenes through employee, philanthropy and supply chain initiatives. If customers can’t see these actions, there’s minimal impact on perceptions, purchase and loyalty.

If you want your good intentions and efforts to be recognized and appreciated by customers, you have to show them. And we’re not talking cause marketing. Customers give credit for experiencing goodness in the customer experience… in the ways in which they interact with your company every day. And the most powerful and memorable reputation-builders are those ethical experiences that are unique and support your brand promise.

The Fruitful Opportunity Audit below shows at a glance the social-impact initiatives of a handful of players within the hospitality industry. This is an illustrative chart based on available information, so don’t get too hung up on the details. What’s important is to see the overall macro-trends, which in this case shows that Fairmont Hotels and Resorts is doing a very effective job aligning CSR initiatives with their brand promise and integrating them into the customer experience relative to Marriott and Intercontinental Hotels. (click image to see full-size.)

Let’s first back up and discuss the chart structure. The columns represent the locus of initiative; whether it’s primarily targeted to your suppliers, employers, community or customers. The bottom row shows tablestakes initiatives that most businesses are undertaking regardless of industry. These include basic blocking and tackling like CSR reporting, employee volunteerism, sustainability initiatives in energy, water, waste, IT and supply chain, and so on. Note that it also includes philanthropy efforts that are not directly aligned with the category or brand; while these efforts are admirable, they’re not aligned with brand and business. It’s likely that redirecting those funds into more brand-relevant programs will generate more bang for your buck.

The middle row represents activities that are industry-specific. Now we’re getting into actions that are more strategically in line with your business and therefore could be more effective in reputation-building. IHG offers the Innovation Hotel, an educational online tour through a prototype green hotel. It’s not yet a brand builder because none of these hotels (and therefore customer experiences) currently exist in the IHG portfolio, but it’s a great start. Green meetings, combating sex tourism, developing hospitality talent and ensuring diversity among hotel owners are all examples of hospitality-specific CSR.

The top row is where it gets really interesting… this is where you’ll see social-impact initiatives that directly support the brand promise. This specific comparison I’m doing is a bit unfair, as Fairmont Hotels has a more tightly defined value proposition than the master brands of Marriott and IHG. But you’ll see that Fairmont’s done a great job filtering their CSR activities through their brand lens of turning moments into memories through unrivaled presence (a large percentage of their properties are historic landmarks), authentically local experiences, and engaging service. One authentically local CSR initiative is supporting local farmers – the menus always reflect local, organic cuisine, and a unique travel package called “Shop with Chef” enables travelers to tap into the head chef’s knowledge of the local farmer’s market. They have private-label organic, free-trade tea for guests, numerous eco-travel packages, and hybrid cars available for guest use. Fairmont also has the largest number of hotels located in UNESCO World Heritage Sites, national and provincial parks and biosphere reserves of any major North American hotel company, so their partnership with World Heritage Alliance reinforces the brand.

Again, it’s possible that I’m missing some brand-building efforts for Marriott and IHG, yet the challenge is that they have very undifferentiated brand positions for the parent companies. For example, Marriott defines itself as “a leading lodging company.” IHG is “an international hotel company whose goal is to create Great Hotels Guests Love.” There’s not much that’s differentiating about either proposition, which makes it hard to create distinctive programs that are uniquely identified with either brand. Many of their sub-brands, like the luxury JW Marriott brand, have much more tightly defined positions and therefore would be easier to use as a filter and a guide for strategic CSR.

One next step for either of these corporations is to borrow an idea from Starwood and create a brand that is positioned entirely in a social or environmental impact space. Starwood’s Element brand is the company’s green hotel chain. Another example is Joie de Vivre’s Good Hotel which is anchored on doing good for people and planet. Or, take a cue from Fairmont Hotels; revise the vision/mission for a sub-brand to better incorporate strategic CSR and begin building a branded experience to match.

So to summarize: to build the ethical reputation you first need a strong brand position that can serve as a strategic lens for CSR initiatives. Next, think about how to embed social impact into the actual customer experience. Show, and you won’t need to tell. Stand out from your competitors. Be a company worth experiencing, and your customers will applaud you.

To discuss the implications for your own company’s brand and customer experience (along with how to measure shifts in customer perceptions), feel free to contact me at jennifer@fruitfulstrategy.com.

Recently I’ve been thinking about how it applies to CSR and sustainability efforts, especially in light of the economic downturn. As the economy grew, more consumers and businesses could be found at the top of the hierarchy… going beyond the “me” focus and expanding into greater awareness of social and environmental issues. I would theorize that in an economic downturn that many consumers and businesses that aren’t firmly anchored in the top part of the pyramid would drop back down to the base, focusing primarily on security and safety.

But here’s what’s happening: the recession is slowing CSR efforts among businesses, yet consumers are continuing to purchase green products at the same rate as last year. So while businesses are dropping to the bottom of the pyramid, values-driven consumers remain at the top.

Bottom line? Smart businesses will continue to invest at the top of the pyramid (TOP), capturing preference among TOP consumers and building equity for future growth in this segment when the economy improves.

That said, I do agree with Kathrin Winkler (of EMC) who wrote in a guest post on Kevin Moss’ (of BP) blog:

“there are other less worthy targets for the (greenwashing) label. There is the slightly naïve company (or, more likely, marketing communications person) who is genuinely proud of positive steps that were taken in their own right, but hasn’t looked at them in the greater context of materiality…. What about the more aggressive companies that push the edge of the envelope, by necessity running up against the untested and controversial, and then getting slapped down for their efforts?… And then there’s the “whitespace” situation in which a company is doing something relevant and material, so gets chastised for something else they haven’t (yet) done, even if it’s far less material.”

I’d add a fourth consideration to Kathrin’s list: the context of each individual industry. So while BP also showed up on the list of top 10 greenwashers, I’m not entirely sure it belongs there. The company is emerging from an entrenched position in an unsustainable category, and it takes time to turn the Titanic without compromising current shareholders. The article says that it spent “a paltry 6.8% of BP’s total revenue on alternative energy,” yet it fails to put that into context of other energy companies which it outspends. Why are we bashing BP as much as Exxon, whose CEO  refuses to even get on board? In an article last year about lawmakers’ criticism of big oil:

“Markey hammered Exxon’s Simon over the company’s investment in renewable energy. “Why is Exxon Mobil resisting the renewable energy revolution?” asked Markey. Simon said Exxon has given $100 million to Stanford to study renewables. “$100 million?” said Markey. “But you made $40 billion last year.”

IMO, criticizing BP is like criticizing the turtle for not being as fast as the hare. It’s still leading all the other turtles. Before we start throwing the greenwashing label around, I think it’s important to consider a) the context of the industry and competitive activities, and b) demonstrated improvements over time. Let’s give some credit where credit’s due, even if companies aren’t yet living up to ideal standards. It’s a journey and we’re nowhere close to the finish line, but I think we’re making progress.

I’d love to generate a discussion on this subject. How do you separate fair from unfair criticism? What’s the real dividing line between a greenwasher and a company with good intentions but just can’t change fast enough to please everyone?

The key to building the socially good brand is a mindshift from silos to systems… from independence to interdependence. There should be a single strategy anchored in customer insight that defines not only what the organization does, but also how it behaves and interacts with all stakeholders. When each department is left to create its own vision of social impact, the result is inefficient and contradictory at best, and self-sabotaging at worst.

Each group has its own strengths and weaknesses when it comes to setting this type of strategy. A CSR department focused on compliance, fair labor and philanthropy doesn’t usually have the skill sets of customer insights and profitable innovation. A marketing or public affairs department can unilaterally decide on a cause-focused direction only at its own peril; customers are increasingly jaded and intolerant of companies who don’t fully walk their talk. Brand managers are often focused on their own products’ brand equity and have little to no influence over corporate alignment with a cause. It’s time to pull it all together, which is admittedly a tall task for most.

Creating the socially good brand is likely the single biggest opportunity for internal and external collaboration for companies today.  Employees and customers want to be part of something bigger. And more importantly, it alleviates the risk of PR fiascos, builds consumer trust through consistent words and actions, and has a positive bottom-line impact even in the downturn.

So how do you shift from fragmented programs to a unified strategy to build a socially good brand? Here’s our top 10 list. If you have more suggestions, comments are very welcome.

1. Ensure executive leadership in recognizing the company’s role in the larger societal ecosystem, committing to conscious capitalism, and being willing to make tough decisions that align actions with rhetoric.
2. Gain buy-in across departments that “singing from the same songbook” will lead to significantly greater impact than one-off programs.
3. Be willing to cut pet projects in favor of a laser focus on initiatives that drive brand and business goals.
4. Develop a deeper understanding of what each group can bring to the party. For example, marketing should be bringing stakeholder insights and competitive analysis to work with CSR pros on identifying the most fruitful way to build brand equity through social impact. Marketing is also great at simplifying messages to be readily understood by stakeholders.
5. Leverage innovative thinkers and departments to come up with your company’s version of GreenWorks or Ecomagination – profitable ways to demonstrate your company’s commitment. This is how we shift perceptions of CSR beyond “BDF” (babies, dolphins, and forests) and create sustainable, meaningful change.
6. Before committing to a cause-related direction, be sure to understand whether your brand has any credibility among your stakeholders. If the answer is no, figure out exactly what actions you need to take in order to gain credibility, and create an evolution strategy to get there. Or switch to a cause that is more believable for your organization.
7. Understand the customer touchpoints that drive purchase and loyalty, and find ways to ensure that your customers fully experience your social commitment. While you’re at it, look for ways that your customer experience might be sending mixed signals and contradicting your public rhetoric.
8. Don’t demand from suppliers what you’re not willing to do yourself. If you want suppliers to adhere to codes of conduct, create one for your own company that ensures realistic expectations and outlines ways to collaborate rather than dictate. Nike is setting a good example here.
9. Establish metrics across the business, not only for internal initiatives like carbon footprint but also for customer perceptions and attitudes. How are you closing the gaps between customer expectations and their beliefs about your brand? (And do you even know what those gaps are?)
10. Collaborate with customers. The more you engage them in honest and transparent dialogue, the more trust can be built. You can even solicit their feedback on what metrics they’d like to see instead of unilaterally deciding what to measure.

What are the roadblocks within your company to building a socially good brand? Or, what has really worked within your company to make this happen?